Tag Archives: Sci-fi

All sci-fi movies.

Watch, The (2012)

Director: Akiva Schaffer
Writer(s): Jared Stern, Seth Rogen, and Evan Goldberg
Cast: Vince Vaughn, Ben Stiller, Jonah Hill, Richard Ayoade, and Rosemarie DeWitt
Rated: R (language, nudity)
Sites: IMDb/trailer Official movie site

thewatchThere was only one thing I knew about The Watch that had me wanting to see it before I even saw the trailer, and that was Richard Ayoade. I have long been a huge fan of the UK comedy series The IT Crowd which Ayoade stars in. The man is a comic genius, and I didn’t care what The Watch was about, I was just eager to see one of the funniest character actors I’ve seen in a long time in a mainstream picture.

The film takes place in a cookie-cutter American suburb of Glenview, Ohio. Evan (Ben Stiller) is manager at the local Costco, who’s overcompensates for his male insecurities by taking part in countless clubs and activities, anything but spending time with his hot wife Abby (Rosemarie DeWitt). Things get shaken up when Evan’s friend and Costco security guard, Antonio (Joe Nunez), is suspiciously murdered one night in the store. Evan’s solution is to create a new club: the Neighborhood Watch.

Evan attracts only a few eager volunteers: Bob (Vince Vaughn), the man’s man looking for some buddies to party with; Franklin (Jonah Hill), the police academy flunky; and Jamarcus (Richard Ayoade). the quirky and mysterious British lad. The group of misfits get off to a rough start with the watch, which mostly turns into an excuse for most of the guys to drink and get away from their personal troubles. Just as Evan loses hope for the group, they come across a curious lead whilst on patrol one night.

The film then takes a rather unexpected turn. I’d say that turn is rather silly, but it really is on par with the whole movie leading up to it. From the opening scene I knew what I was in for with this film. The raunchy and idiotic comedy driven by sex, beer, racism and other standards of film’s in its class is abundant. This genre isn’t particularly my forte, but every now and then, one of these moronic comedies is a good change of pace to just let loose.

The characters lack depth, we don’t really care about them, and the story is so incredibly zany and silly that it feels like the everything is just drawn in with disregard for coherence. But honestly, that seems like exactly what they set out to do with this film. It’s a silly comedy about a bunch of guys, each with their own issues, who wind up in a sci-fi plot. And to be honest, I laughed like crazy. As I said, every now and then it’s good to just check your mind at the door. I was due for a nonsense comedy with a wild story and wacky characters, and The Watch delivered. And of course, Richard Ayoade is the icing on the cake with his signature brand of humor.

Share

Prometheus (2012)

Director: Ridley Scott
Writer(s): Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, based on elements created by Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett
Cast: Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron, Logan Marshall-Green, and Idris Elba
Rated: R (violence, some language)
Sites: IMDb/trailer Official movie site

Prometheus movie review

Prometheus was one of my most anticipated films of the year. The mysterious Ridley Scott project showed promise of being a modern sci-fi masterpiece while at the same time building off of the world created by a classic sci-fi masterpiece (Alien). Now, I won’t go on pretending to be an Alien expert, it’s been years since I’ve seen the original film and science fiction isn’t my typical go-to genre. However, I love a creative and imaginative sci-fi flick when I do watch them, and Prometheus seemed like it had everything I was looking for.

Perhaps more importantly than the overall look and concept of the film, the initial reports of the film’s cast had me intrigued long before I saw any images from the film itself. Noomi Rapace quickly became my favorite actress from her demanding performance in the Swedish The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and sequels. I’ve since sought out all her other work I could obtain in the States, and was only more in love. Her exposure in Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows was only a teaser for her U.S. film debut, the true test was her leading role as Elizabeth Shaw in the futuristic epic.

Aside from Noomi, the rest of the cast would leave movie fans dying with excitement. The powerful Michael Fassbender and the always amazing Charlize Theron, along with a promising supporting cast offered much to look forward to. Needless to say, the film set its expectations fairly high, which usually always ends up in fan disappointment. But hype aside, I can honestly say I loved this film. I actually felt that my relative unfamiliarity with the Alien franchise gave me some benefit in enjoying the film, as I didn’t put pressure on the film to live up to anything else. I took it in for what it was, and I think that’s always the best thing to do when watching any movie.

Aesthetically the world in the film is stunning. The barren wasteland of the far away planet our group of discoverers arrive on has a decrepit yet mystifying beauty to it. The space scenes are gorgeous as well, which are prime examples of how modern effects can be used efficiently. Then there are the “Engineers,” who are crafted with such beauty and eeriness. Every aspect of the film visually was spot on, which one can greatly appreciate when watching the Blu-ray. Visually speaking, the film is a work of art.

Prometheus - earth

But of course a film has to be more than eye candy. So does it truly deliver? The story for me was very interesting. Many questions are asked, and just as many left unanswered. Perhaps this is what frustrated some moviegoers, but that’s something I can really appreciate about a film. Our main characters, doctors Shaw (Rapace) and Holloway (Marshall-Green) lead the voyage on which they seek answers to the origins of life. We’re presented with images of ancient beings throughout the film, and our characters experience several events that only build up the questions and complexity in an otherwise straight-forward plot.

One of the potential pitfalls the film fell victim was its urge to cut to the chase. After watching the Blu-ray, I dove into some of the special features. The commentary on several deleted scenes revealed while certain scenes were cut. These cut scenes added more dimension to the characters, made them seem more real and made us feel more connected to them. They were cut more or less to save time. This is the one aspect I felt held the film down. The mentally intriguing story, astounding visuals and superb cast were the building blocks for a truly amazing film. This is one of those films that could easily be near 3 hours long, and I wouldn’t complain (such as with the Harry Potter films). That extra time dedicated to building on the characters gives the film that humanity that makes it more of an emotional experience than a titillating thrill ride.

Putting that one aspect aside, this film was fantastic. Whenever a film comes with a huge hype surrounding it, it’s bound to let many down. It’s tough to avoid the advertisements, articles and gossip about blockbusters like this, but the effort to do so pays off in terms of enjoying the movie. I loved Prometheus, and it really left me wanting more. I just hope for a possible extended, uncut version, and potentially even better, a sequel that can be as good as the original while making up for what this film left out.

Share

Cabin in the Woods (2012)

Director: Drew Goddard
Writers: Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard
Rated: R (violence, language)
Cast: Kristen Connolly, Chris Hemsworth, Anna Hutchison, Fran Kranz, and Jesse Williams
IMDb/trailer | Official movie site

Cabin in the Woods movie reviewCabin in the Woods had a lot of promise. It’s written by Joss Whedon, which guarantees a fan base, and Drew Goddard, writer of the clever and funCloverfield. It got some decent buzz in the horror community upon its release, and the trailer left a lot of questions to be answered, which naturally made me very curious about it.

Sadly, as it often happens, the film leaves me with a different feeling than my expectations. I try to avoid hearing about movies I haven’t yet seen for this specific reason, but what are you gonna do? Either way, Cabin in the Woods definitely had some things that were noteworthy, but far from being the film to reinvent horror.

The setup is one we’ve seen many times before, but this of course is by design. A group of 5 stereotypical college kids venture to a remote cabin for a getaway. They make a stop at a very cliche service station with a very cliche hillbilly attendant that gives them a bad vibe about the trip. We’re also flipped back and forth between a high-tech looking control room with a bunch of goofy guys in ties making bad jokes as they monitor the group.

As I mentioned, this all becomes very obviously by design once we see the control room. However the film is more than just an elaborate rip on horror cliches? I immediately got an Evil Dead vibe once they arrived in the cabin, and there are a few other nods throughout. The homages and jokes are clear, but the filmmakers desperately try to make this something more and clever.

The main problem I had with the film was that the setup made me lose interest. While the film had a very interesting reveal towards the end, the build up was predictable, be it intended or not it still made me feel impatient and irritated the majority of the time. To top it off, the cutout characters were unlikeable to the point you look forward to their inescapable deaths. Again this is intentional, as it all builds up towards something bigger at hand, but nonetheless it was fairly annoying.

I mentioned the big reveal towards the end, and that really is the icing of the movie. The clever explanation behind the mystery of the film was unique and interesting, and there are some wild events that take place that really make one think WTF?! There definitely is a lot to appreciate with this film, and it makes for an entertaining time. I just can’t help but feel all the film’s effort was in the ending and everything leading up was too convenient and lacking anything really interesting. I think it was meant to be both an homage and challenge to the horror community, and while it achieved what I think it sent out to, I still felt slightly unfulfilled. Though I was let down with many aspects of the film, it certainly is a welcomed change in today’s horror scene.

Share

Hunger Games, The (2012)

Director: Gary Ross
Writers: Gary Ross, Suzanne Collins (screenplay and novel), and Billy Ray
Cast: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Stanley Tucci, Woody Harrelson, Lenny Kravitz, and Liam Hemsworth
Rated: PG-13 (teen violence)
IMDb/trailer | Official move siteThe Hunger Games movie review

I’ve reviewed the insanely popular book The Hunger Games in both written and video form. The video review still continues to be one of the most viewed on YouTube and is one of my most viewed videos. That just says something about how a story can have so much of an impact. The film version of the first book of the series was sure to be a success with an already astounding fan base, so I was quite eager to check it out. Luckily, I was able to get press access to an early screening of this one (yay me!), which made it all the more exciting.

The film is directed by Gary Ross, which was a surprising choice for me. He’s most known for films like Seabiscuit and Pleasantville, so I was unsure how he’d handle such an over-the-top production that the material called for. He ended up being a fine choice however, as the book’s fantastical futuristic and post-apocalyptic world was translated perfectly onto the screen. The writing is also done by Ross, with the book’s author Suzanne Collins and Billy Ray contributing to the screenplay. The follows very closely to the book, which was certainly a wise choice in order to not upset the already huge group of book fans that were guaranteed to purchase a ticket.

The Hunger Games follows 12 districts which formerly made up North America, now known as Panem. Panem is run by a totalitarian government known as the Capitol. Each year the Capitol reminds the citizens of their control by holding the Hunger Games, a fight-to-the-death survival competition featuring a boy and girl chosen at random from each district. The concept may sound similar, as the idea has been done in many other books and movies, however The Hunger Games still does manage to be unique enough to hold its own. There have been constant comparisons to other certain titles, however I find such comparisons pointless as the characters and world Collins created are original and interesting.

The Hunger Games - Katniss and Gale

The story centers on 16 year old Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) of the rustic and impoverished District 12. During the Reaping, or selection ceremony for the tributes that will represent the district in the games, Katniss’ younger sister Prim (Willow Shields) gets chosen. Without a second thought, Katniss throws herself forward and volunteers to take Prim’s place. The boy chosen is Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), and shortly after the two head towards the Capitol for their training where they are introduced to a world unlike anything they have seen in their village.

The Capitol was where most of my worries about the film adaptation existed. The futuristic world called for technology that doesn’t exist and wild clothing and hairdos (and skindos), which I wasn’t sure if they’d be able to match my imagination’s interpretation. However I was pleasantly surprised at the film’s ability to capture the book’s descriptions nearly perfectly. Not that I deny the ability of the talented individuals that have churned out some breathtaking effects and designs over the past several years, but it’s tough I think for a film to match what most people picture when reading the book. In this case, I think they nailed it.

Once the games actually kick off, the excitement doesn’t let up. For fans of survival adventure movies such as myself, the film is a treat. There’s an excellent display of survival techniques and tactical scenarios. While the film does don a PG-13 rating, there is also a surprising amount of violence involved. The story, after all, does involve kids killing kids, but the film is impressively able to pull of some of the more gruesome scenes without exploiting the gore and carnage. The action scenes are adrenaline-filled, which is good but could also give some viewers motion sickness. The camera work is fast, moving right along at the pace of the action. I liked the style at times, but the shaky cam also did hinder the detail of some of the combat scenes.

The Hunger Games - Gamemakers arena

The pacing of the film also works both in favor of and against the movie. At over 2 hours long, it feels much shorter. Because of this, however, many scenes that in the book were very emotional and significant seemed very much rushed past in the film, placing more attention to the action. I understand there’s a lot of ground to cover with the story, and in order to keep it to one part they had to do a bit of cramming, but a few pivotal scenes were either ignored or barely touched on which was a disappointment.

Being highly impressed with Lawrence in Winter’s Bone, I knew she would tackle the role of Katniss with ease and she certainly did. I’m not usually too impressed with Josh Hutcherson, but I felt he did well as Peeta. The rest of the cast was just perfect, from Woody Harrelson as the drunken mentor Haymitch, to the always impressive Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickerman. The colorful characters were represented well, and I felt like the actors really brought each one to life.

The film overall is a great example of a book adaptation done well. There may have been a few things I would have liked to have seen, but it captures a huge amount of detail in a relatively short time that seems to go by without notice. With the Games’ impressive arena, full of manipulated nature and engineered animals, combined with a perfect cast and action that never lets up once it gets started, I can imagine without having read the book there really wouldn’t be a lot to be unimpressed with. While the books may be popular with the female teen audience, due to its empowering heroine, this is a matured teen survival adventure flick that adults of both sexes can enjoy.

Share

Third Contact (2011)

Director/writer: Simon Horrocks
Cast: Tim Scott-Walker, Oliver Browne, Jannica Olin, Cristiana Dell’Anna and Kristina Erdely
Rated: Not rated (violence, nudity)
Official movie site/trailer | IMDb

Third Contact movie review

Its not often movies will make my head spin, but Simon Horrocks’ Third Contact is one such case. This psychologically-driven film follows David (Tim Scott-Walker), a psychotherapist who’s seemingly feeling more like his patients lately with bouts of depression and a sense hopelessness. He contemplates ending things himself until he has an encounter with Erika (Jannica Olin), the sister of a former patient who has recently died. Suddenly the mysteriousness surrounding the patient’s death gives David reason to stick around, at least for the time being.

As David digs deeper into the apparent suicide of his patient, strange and mysterious things start to happen. It’s not long before I began to realize the film was going to be a psychological puzzle of sorts. When another patient of David’s dies, again by apparent suicide which eerily resemble the prior case, things really get heavy. Is there some sort of cult behind this? Some kind of conspiracy? David desperately wants to find out, likely for the sake of rescuing his own dignity and reputation if nothing else.

During his investigation, David tracks down a contact of one of his deceased patients. This is where the bizarre factor really gets turned up a notch in the movie. After the encounter, David wakes up in a small room. Someone is outside the door, but this detail seems insignificant. He looks out the window, seeing what appears to be himself walking down the street with a woman. Is he somehow in another dimension? Is it time travel? As each strange event takes place, the more the questions build up.

I admit that I may have lost track of many of the occurrences that took place and likely misplaced their sequence in retrospect, but that fact goes to illustrate the complexity that begins to unfold in the story. I watched the second half of the film twice, and even in the second viewing I can’t say with confidence I have a great understanding of the film. This is certainly not a complaint. I love a film that challenges the viewer, asks many questions, and leaves a lot to be interpreted and this film does just that.

The film reminded me a little bit of Aronofski’s Pi. Aside from the black and white filming style, both films follow troubled lead characters who get entwined in cryptic and mind-bending situations. I really appreciate original films like this (despite causing a bit of mental frustration at times!). The characters were elusive and the narration was poetic and just as mysterious at times. The conversations were surprisingly interesting as well, especially those between David and patient Karl (Oliver Browne). I found myself wanting to know what “destinations” were just like David. By the end of the film, I still had many questions but I wanted more.

This is one of those films I’ll need, and want, to watch on more occasions just to see what new details I may have missed before. Writer/director Simon Horrocks did a great job combining both the style and substance with this one. The look and pace of the film fit the source material, so much that I felt closer to the main character. While the film certainly is more psychologically-driven, and this one especially requires a lot of attention, it was quite stimulating. The ending had me saying “what the…” and had me coming up with my theories. Third Contact may leave you with more questions than answers, but that shouldn’t be a bad thing especially in today’s cinematic climate.

 

Share